Wilfrida Arnodah Itolondo v Board of Trustees of Kenyatta University Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme [2017] KECA 104 (KLR)

Facts

The appellant expressed interest in being a trustee of the respondent's staff pension scheme, but was barred due to a pending court case against the scheme's sponsor and her role as a union delegate. She filed a petition challenging the respondent's action.

Issues

1. Whether the respondent's action of barring the appellant from vying for the position of trustee was in violation of her fundamental rights and freedoms.
2. Whether the respondent's action was unreasonable and unconstitutional.
3. Whether the respondent's action infringed on the appellant's right to access a court of law and her right to vie for the position as a co-opted member of UASU.

Reasoning

The court found no transgression in the learned Judge's judgment and no misapprehension of facts or misapplication of law. The court did not misinterpret the facts or misapply the law.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited