SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Westmont Holdings SDN. BHD v Central Bank of Kenya [2017] KECA 108 (KLR)

[2017] KECA 108 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
108
Citation
[2017] KECA 108 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a final order in a civil suitCoramW. KARAN, KARANJA, KOOME
Holding

The court ordered Westmont to deposit security for costs in the sum of Kshs 20,000,000 within 45 days of the ruling, failing which the appeal will stand struck out with costs to CBK.

Facts

In 1998, Kamlesh Mansukhlal Pattin and Westmont filed a civil suit against the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) for a refund of certain sums of money paid as a deposit towards the purchase of a property in Nairobi. The suit was reinstated in 2014 and concluded after 18 years. CBK filed a supplementary record of appeal and exchanged correspondence with the court registry.

Issues

  1. Whether to order the appellant, Westmont Holdings SDN BHD, to provide security for costs in the sum of Kshs 20,000,000
  2. Whether the appeal was brought after undue delay or to abuse the court process

Reasoning

The court found the appeal to be a suitable case for ordering security for costs due to the amount in dispute, other costs ordered to be paid by the appellant in the High Court, and the potential professional services and attendant costs likely to be incurred in defending the appeal.

Outcome

The appeal was ordered to be stayed pending the deposit of security for costs.

Orders

  • Ordering Westmont to deposit security for costs in the sum of Kshs 20,000,000 within 45 days of the ruling
  • Striking out the appeal with costs to CBK if the security is not deposited within the time frame

Remedies

  • Ordering Westmont to deposit security for costs in the sum of Kshs 20,000,000 within 45 days of the ruling
  • Striking out the appeal with costs to CBK if the security is not deposited within the time frame
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case