SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Emily Nekesa Cosmas v Republic [2017] KECA 269 (KLR)

[2017] KECA 269 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
269
Citation
[2017] KECA 269 (KLR)
Decided
24 March 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from a conviction and sentence of death for murderCoramD. K. Musinga, S. G. Gatebu Kairu, A. K. Murgor
Holding

The court quashed the appellant's conviction of murder and substituted it with a conviction of manslaughter. The death sentence was set aside and replaced with a sentence of fifteen years imprisonment.

Facts

The appellant, Emily Nekesa Cosmas, was charged with murdering her sister's eleven-year-old niece, Isabella Namucheka Masinde, on November 12, 2006. The appellant left her baby with the deceased and went to the market. Upon returning, she found the baby alone and accused the deceased of stealing her money and property. The deceased's body was later found in a trench covered with fresh leaves.

Issues

  1. Whether the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to convict the appellant of murder
  2. Whether the appellant had malice aforethought in assaulting the deceased

Reasoning

The court found sufficient circumstantial evidence linking the appellant to the deceased's death, but was unable to establish malice aforethought. The appellant's intention was to punish the deceased for leaving the baby unattended, but the act resulted in her death.

Outcome

Conviction of manslaughter and sentence of 15 years imprisonment

Orders

  • Quash the conviction of murder
  • Substitute conviction with manslaughter
  • Set aside death sentence
  • Substitute sentence with 15 years imprisonment

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Penal Code
Cases cited (2)
  • Rex v Kipkering Arap Koske & Another (1949) 16 EACA 135
  • Wills on circumstantial evidence 6th edition page 311
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case