SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wanyiri Kihoro v Attorney General [2017] KECA 285 (KLR)

[2017] KECA 285 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
285
Citation
[2017] KECA 285 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Kenya from the Judgment and Decree of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi (Gachuhi, Masime & Kwach, JJ.A) dated 17th March, 1993 Civil Appeal No. 151 of 1988CoramP. N. WAKI, R. N. NAMBUYE, P. O. KIAGE
Holding

The Court of Appeal finds that the applicant was kept in prolonged detention during which he was intensely and continuously interrogated, and that his holding by the police for 74 days was illegal.

Facts

The applicant, Wanyiri Kihoro, was arrested in Mombasa by agents of the State on the night of 29/30 July, 1986 and held in the Nyayo torture chambers for three months until 10th October, 1986. He was detained without trial until 1st June, 1989. He filed a suit in the High Court questioning his arrest, detention, torture and inhuman treatment.

Issues

  1. Whether a matter of general public importance is involved in the applicant's intended appeal to the Supreme Court.
  2. Whether the applicant's detention was illegal and in violation of his rights as an officer of the court.

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant was kept in prolonged detention during which he was intensely and continuously interrogated, and that his holding by the police for 74 days was illegal as it was contrary to section 72 and 74 of the law.

Outcome

The Court of Appeal grants the applicant a certificate under Article 163 (4) (b) of the Constitution that a matter of general public importance is involved in his intended appeal to the Supreme Court.

Orders

  • Granting the applicant a certificate under Article 163 (4) (b) of the Constitution that a matter of general public importance is involved in his intended appeal to the Supreme Court.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Section 72 and 74 of the law
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case