SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wanyoike v Medical Practiontioners and Dentist Board & another [2017] KECA 452 (KLR)

[2017] KECA 452 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
452
Citation
[2017] KECA 452 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Odunga, J.) dated 24th March, H.C. Misc. Appl. No. 70 of 2014CoramALNASHIR VISRAM, W. KARANJA, M. K. KOOME
Holding

The appeal lacks merit and is dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent

Facts

Dr. Wanyoike Gichuhi was a consultant Obstetrician/Gynaecologist registered by the Medical Practitioners and Dentist Board. A patient named N filed a complaint against Dr. Wanyoike in December 2000, alleging negligence leading to severe tears to her uterus and loss of her unborn baby. The complaint was dismissed for want of prosecution in 2011. The Board then conducted a preliminary inquiry and ratified the findings, recommending Dr. Wanyoike to appear in most extensive remedial nature.

Issues

  1. Whether the appeal lacks merit
  2. Whether the High Court has the authority to order the Board to issue a licence

Reasoning

The court dismissed the appeal as it found no merit in the case. The court also stated that the High Court cannot prohibit the Board from further investigating the complaint, as it is the Board's mandate to investigate its members on allegations of professional misconduct.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Medical Practitioners and Dentists (Disciplinary Proceedings) Procedure Rules
  • Medical Practitioners and Dentists Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case