SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

James Thomas Andafu v Joseph Makokha Akhulunya [2018] KECA 245 (KLR)

[2018] KECA 245 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
245
Citation
[2018] KECA 245 (KLR)
Decided
18 October 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for stay of execution pending the lodgement, hearing and determination of an intended appealCoramE. M. Githinji, Hannah Okwengu, J. Mohammed
Holding

The application is allowed, and the stay of execution of the judgment and orders is granted, and the cancellation of the title deed and transfer to the respondent of title No. Butsotso/Indangalasia/248 is stayed pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.

Facts

James Thomas Andafu applied for a stay of execution of the judgment and decree made by the Environment and Land Court, N. A. Matheka, J, dated 17 May 2018, in favour of Joseph Makokha Akhulunya, regarding the suit property.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent was entitled to the suit property by way of adverse possession.
  2. Whether the intended appeal is arguable and will be rendered nugatory if the orders sought are not granted and the appeal succeeds.

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant has demonstrated grounds which merit serious consideration and that the appeal is arguable and will be rendered nugatory if the orders sought are not granted and the appeal succeeds.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • A stay of execution of the Judgment and Orders of 17 May, 2018 is granted.
  • The cancellation of the title Deed and transfer to the respondent of title No. Butsotso/Indangalasia/248 is stayed pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.

Remedies

  • Preservation of status quo pending appeal.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Stanley Kang'ethe Kinyanjui Vs. Tony Keter & 5 Others, Civil Application No. Nai 31/2012
  • Reliance Bank Ltd Vs. Norlake Investments Ltd [2002] I EA 227
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case