P A W-M v C M A W M [2018] KECA 734 (KLR)

Facts

The appellant and respondent were British citizens married in 1997. They cohabited in Kenya from 2007 until their divorce in 2016. The suit property was inherited by the husband's father and later bought by the husband. The appellant lived in the property and supervised renovations.

Issues

1. Whether the suit property is matrimonial property
2. Whether the appellant is entitled to 50% of the suit property
3. Whether the appellant's contribution to the renovations should be compensated

Reasoning

The court found the suit property was not held in trust for the appellant, and her contribution was minimal. The court also considered the appellant's long-term residence in Kenya and her potential future needs.

Outcome

The appeal is partially successful, and the appellant is awarded Ksh 3 million as compensation.