SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Diana Katumbi Kiio v Reuben Musyoki Muli [2018] KECA 860 (KLR)

[2018] KECA 860 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
860
Citation
[2018] KECA 860 (KLR)
Decided
19 January 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Ruling/Orders of the Environment and Land CourtCoramP. N. Waki, Asike-Makhandia, P. O. Kiage
Holding

The appellant had acquired a clear interest in plot 332 upon which a claim of 'recovery of land' could be based in terms of Section 7 of LAA. The claim was not time barred.

Facts

The appellant and respondent signed an agreement for the sale of plot 332 in Machakos Town Block 11/332 for KShs. 450,000. The respondent gave possession and consent to the transfer, but the registration was rejected due to the expired lease. The respondent later extended the lease, but refused to hand over the new certificate of lease.

Issues

  1. Whether an agreement for sale of land gives rise to a cause of action for recovery of the land or a cause of action in contract.
  2. Whether the time limitation for filing suit under the Limitation of Actions Act was complied with.

Reasoning

The court held that the appellant's possession and payment of purchase price created an equitable interest in the land, which is protected by law. The claim was within the limitation period.

Outcome

The appeal is allowed, the order of the Environment and Land Court is set aside, and the main suit and notice of motion are reinstated.

Orders

  • The order of the Environment and Land Court is set aside.
  • The main suit and notice of motion are reinstated.
  • The appellant shall have the costs of this appeal.

Remedies

  • Reinstatement of the main suit and notice of motion.
  • The appellant's costs of the appeal.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Mwangi & Another vs Mwangi, (1986) KLR 328
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case