SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Julius Masiva Obuga v Kenya Broadcasting Corporation [2019] KECA 30 (KLR)

[2019] KECA 30 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
30
Citation
[2019] KECA 30 (KLR)
Decided
30 December 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of the High Court at Eldoret (Nambuye, J) dated 3rd November 2004 in HCCC No 35 of 1995CoramGithinji, H. Okwengu, J. Mohammed
Holding

The appellant's complaint that he was retired without his consent is baseless, and the appeal fails on that score.

Facts

The appellant, Julius Masiva Obuga, sued the Kenya Broadcasting Corporation for unlawful dismissal, pension arrears, and other damages. The appellant claimed he was unlawfully dismissed and that his employment should have been under the respondent corporation rather than the Public Service Commission. The respondent produced documents indicating the appellant did not contribute to the pension scheme and had indicated his intention to retire at age 50.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant became an employee of the respondent corporation upon its creation
  2. Whether the appellant's employment ended without his consent

Reasoning

The appellant expressed his intention to retire upon attaining the age of 50 years and took steps to ensure he would retire at a reasonable pension. The documents produced in court, including a letter confirming his correct grading, prove he did take steps to retire.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Kenya Broadcasting and Corporation Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Abok James Odera & Associates v John Patrick Machira t/a Machira & Co. Advocates [2013] eKLR (Civil Appeal No. 161 of 1999)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case