SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Joyce Arus Owiti v National Police Service Commission [2020] KECA 373 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 373 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
373
Citation
[2020] KECA 373 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication for extension of time to file record of appealCoramR. N. NAMBUYE
Holding

The court grants the application for extension of time to file the record of appeal, allowing the applicant thirty days to do so.

Facts

The applicant, Joyce Arus Owiti, filed an appeal against a judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court, but her record of appeal was not filed in time due to a certified copy of the proceedings not being available.

Issues

  1. Whether the petition before the trial court was meritorious
  2. Whether the applicant was accorded a fair hearing
  3. Whether the vetting process was a nullity ab initio
  4. Whether the vetting board flouted constitutional, statutory, and regulatory provisions governing the process

Reasoning

The court found the delay in filing the record of appeal to be within a reasonable period and that the applicant's former advocate's failure to file the record was excusable.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • The applicant has thirty days to file and serve the record of appeal.
  • Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the intended appeal.
  • In default of item (1) above, the leave granted to stand lapsed with costs to the respondent.

Remedies

  • Extension of time to file the record of appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat vs. Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 Others [2014]eKLR
  • James Waweru Muturi vs. Paul Thuo Njambi [2017]eKLR
  • George Mwende Muthoni Vs Mama Day Nursery and Primary School, Nyeri CA No. 4 of 2014, (UR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case