SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jades Collections Limited v Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers Union Limited [2020] KECA 564 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 564 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
564
Citation
[2020] KECA 564 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Employment and Labour Relations Court of KenyaCoramJ. Mohammed, Kiage, Jamila Mohammed
Holding

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the learned Judge did not err in exercising his discretion.

Facts

The respondent reported a trade dispute on behalf of 17 employees of the appellant to the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) under the Labour Relations Act (LRA). The dispute was about alleged victimization of the employees by the appellant. The ELRC dismissed the application for review.

Issues

  1. Whether the learned Judge erred in the exercise of his discretion in dismissing the application for review of a judgment dated 23rd November, 2015 filed by Jade Collections Limited (the appellant) which was entered against the appellant.

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal held that the learned Judge did not misdirect himself in law, misapprehend the facts, take account of considerations of which he should not have taken account, or fail to take account of considerations of which he should have taken account. The Court also found that the appellant did not demonstrate that the allegations were reasonably proved to merit the disturbance of the judgment.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Labour Relations Act (LRA)
  • Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010
Cases cited (6)
  • Mbogo & Another vs. Shah [1968] EA 93
  • Hillary Rotich v Wilson Kipkore [2008] eKLR
  • United India Insurance Co. Ltd v. East African Underwirters (Kenya) Ltd [1985] EA 898
  • JMK V MWM & another [2015] eKLR
  • CMC Holdings Ltd v. James Mumo Nzioki [2004] eKLR
  • Gupta v. Continental Builders Ltd [1976-80] 1 KLR 809
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case