SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mwanaisha Kiriale Mohamed & another v Alfred Wafua Okuku & 2 others [2021] KECA 1058 (KLR)

[2021] KECA 1058 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1058
Citation
[2021] KECA 1058 (KLR)
Decided
29 January 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of the Environment and Land CourtCoramW. OUKO, M.K. KOOME, S. GATEMBU KAIRU
Holding

The appeal fails. There was insufficient evidence to sustain the appellants' suit for nullification of the title in favour of the 2nd and 3rd respondents on grounds of fraud. The 1st respondent's transfer of the properties to the 2nd and 3rd respondents is not null and void.

Facts

The appellants were the registered proprietors of properties until 2008. They charged the properties to Standard Chartered Bank to secure a loan from East Cape Enterprises Limited. The appellants approached the 1st respondent for assistance to redeem the properties from Standard Bank. The appellants and the 1st respondent entered into an arrangement where the 1st respondent would take a loan from Savings and Loan to redeem the charge in favour of Standard Bank. The appellants transferred the properties to the 1st respondent, who then transferred them to the 2nd and 3rd respondents.

Issues

  1. Whether the sale and transfer of properties by the 1st respondent to the 2nd and 3rd respondents is null and void due to fraud
  2. Whether the 2nd and 3rd respondents are innocent purchasers for value without notice of the appellants' interest

Reasoning

The appellants did not prove fraud on the part of the 1st respondent. The 2nd and 3rd respondents were not innocent purchasers for value without notice of the appellants' interest. There was no evidence to support the appellants' claim of fraud.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs to the 2nd and 3rd respondents only.

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case