SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sarah Maria Lobo & another (sued as the Legal Representative/Administrators of the Estate of the late Paul Lobo) v Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission & 2 others [2021] KECA 828 (KLR)

[2021] KECA 828 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
828
Citation
[2021] KECA 828 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for stay of proceedings pending appealCoramW. OUKO, D.K. MUSINGA, S. GATEMBU KAIRU
Holding

The motion lacks merit and is dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent

Facts

The applicants were substituted as legal representatives of the deceased in a suit filed by the 1st respondent against the deceased and the 2nd respondent. The suit sought cancellation of entries in favor of the deceased and the 2nd respondent in the register. The deceased passed away, and the action abated. The 1st respondent applied for revival and substitution, which was allowed. The applicants denied knowledge of the suit and contended that they should not have been joined to the suit.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicants should have been joined to the suit
  2. Whether the cause of action in the suit survived the deceased's death
  3. Whether the applicants as legal representatives of the deceased were properly joined in the proceedings

Reasoning

The Court finds that the appeal is not arguable and that the applicants lack capacity or interest in the suit. The costs incurred by the applicants in defense of the suit and prosecution of the appeal are capable of being recouped.

Outcome

Dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Reliance Bank Ltd. (in liquidation) vs. Norlake Investments Ltd. [2002] 1 EA 227
  • Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui vs. Tony Ketter & 5 others [2013] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case