SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jane Wanjiru Nderitu & another v Shima Properties Limited & another [2021] KECA 854 (KLR)

[2021] KECA 854 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
854
Citation
[2021] KECA 854 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for injunctive orders pending appealCoramW. OUKO, ASIKE-MAKHANDIA, D. K. MUSINGA
Holding

The application for injunction was dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent.

Facts

The applicants, Jane Wanjiru Nderitu and Les Carmes Limited, sought a temporary injunction to restrain the respondents, Shima Properties Limited and Mugesma Auctioneers, from alienating or disposing of the premises Fabian House and any other properties owned by the 1st applicant. The respondents were also ordered to refrain from demanding Kshs. 551,000 pending the interpartes hearing of the suit.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicants had a prima facie case with a probability of success
  2. Whether the applicants stood to suffer irreparable loss or damage that could not be compensated by an award of damages
  3. Whether the applicants had met the second test for the grant of a temporary injunction

Reasoning

The learned Judge dismissed the application because the applicants had breached the Management Contract by defaulting in the payment of rent for the entire period of the tenancy, and the applicants did not stand to suffer any loss that would be irreparable or damage that could not be compensated by an award of damages.

Outcome

Application dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Stanley Kang'ethe Kinyanjui vs. Tony Ketter & 5 others [2013] eKLR
  • Nguruman Ltd vs. Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others (2014) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case