Mary Sidi Mendza & another v Andrew Kamau Denis Kubai & another [2021] KECA 943 (KLR)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 943
- Citation
- [2021] KECA 943 (KLR)
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the High Court's ruling in a civil caseCoramHannah Okwengu, Asike Makhandia, P. O. Kiage
Holding
The motion is improperly before the court and is struck out. No orders as to costs are made.
Facts
The applicants, Mary Sidi Mendza and Jane Njeri Ngeru, filed a notice of motion seeking to enjoin themselves as interested parties in the appeal and to set aside the judgment of the High Court dated 2nd August, 2019.
Issues
- Whether the applicants have the right to be interested parties in the appeal
- Whether the applicants have the right to challenge the judgment of the High Court
Reasoning
The applicants are not legal representatives or administrators of the estate of Moses, who died during the pendency of the appeal.
Outcome
The motion is struck out.
Orders
- The motion is struck out
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…