SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kikambala Development Company Limited & 4 others v Director of Public Prosecutions & 4 others; Kikambala Development Company Limited & 10 others (Interested Parties) (Civil Application 183 & 184 of 2020 (Consolidated)) [2022] KECA 1374 (KLR) (16 December 2022) (Ruling)

[2022] KECA 1374 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1374
Citation
[2022] KECA 1374 (KLR)
Decided
16 December 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication to strike out the Notice of Appeal against the judgment of the High CourtCoramSG Kairu, P Nyamweya, JW Lessit
Holding

The Civil Application No 183 of 2020 and 184 of 2020 dated June 26, 2020 is allowed. The order allowing the applications is suspended pending the outcome of Civil Application No 59 of 2020.

Facts

Kikambala Development Company Limited retained Joseph Karanja Kanyi to represent it in a conveyance transaction for purchase and later sale of land. Kanyi gave a professional undertaking to Cootow & Associates, representing KPARBS, to transfer 70,000,000/- as the agreed deposit of the purchase price. The sale fell through, leading to investigations by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission.

Issues

  1. Whether failure to serve the Notice of Appeal within the prescribed time is a fatal defect

Reasoning

Rule 79(1) of the Rules provides that the Notice of Appeal must be served on the respondent and all parties affected by it within seven days after lodging the notice. Failure to serve within the prescribed time is fatal.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Civil Application No 183 of 2020 and 184 of 2020 dated June 26, 2020 is allowed
  • Order allowing the applications is suspended pending the outcome of Civil Application No 59 of 2020

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Rules of the Court
Cases cited (1)
  • Stephen Kinoro Kamau vs. Wanjiku Kinuthia & another [2005] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case