Kenya Revenue Authority v Universal Corporation Ltd (Civil Appeal (Application) 150 of 2018) [2024] KECA 1103 (KLR) (19 August 2024) (Ruling)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 1103
- Citation
- [2024] KECA 1103 (KLR)
- Decided
- 19 August 2024
The Court of Appeal allowed the appellant's reference, set aside the taxing officer's ruling, and remitted the matter back for re-taxation by a different taxing officer.
Facts
The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) demanded Universal Corporation Ltd (UCL) to pay Kshs 427,918,035 in Value Added Tax (VAT) for the period January 2008 to November 2013. UCL challenged the demand in a High Court Judicial Review Application. The KRA appealed the High Court's decision, and the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's judgment.
Issues
- Whether the High Court erred by assuming jurisdiction over a matter which ought to be heard by the Customs & Excise Tribunal
- In its appreciation and application of the doctrine of legitimate expectation
- In its appreciation and application of the doctrine of proportionality
Reasoning
The Court found that the taxing officer erred by basing the instruction fees on the alleged value of the subject matter, and did not consider other relevant factors such as the amount involved, the importance and difficulty of the appeal, and the interest of the parties.
Outcome
The Court of Appeal allowed the appellant's reference and remitted the matter back for re-taxation.
Orders
- Set aside the taxing officer's ruling
- Remitted the matter back for re-taxation by a different taxing officer
Remedies
- Remedied the error of principle by remitting the matter back for re-taxation
Authorities cited
Cases cited (4)
- First American Bank of Kenya Ltd v Gulab P. Shah & 2 Others (supra)
- Arthur v Nyeri Electricity Undertaking (1961) EA 492
- Steel & Petrol (EA) Ltd v Uganda Sugar Factory Ltd (supra)
- Joreth Ltd v Kigano & Associates (2002) eKLR
Loading judgment…