SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mbitha v Bromine Investments Limited & 6 others (Civil Appeal (Application) E002 of 2022) [2024] KECA 111 (KLR) (9 February 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 111 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
111
Citation
[2024] KECA 111 (KLR)
Decided
9 February 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureApplication to amend the memorandum of appealCoramA. K. MURGOR, DR. K. I. LAIBUTA, G. V. ODUNGA
Holding

The application is allowed, and the proposed memorandum of appeal annexed to the application dated 10th November 2022 is deemed as duly filed and served upon payment of the requisite court fees.

Facts

The applicant, Kalume Karisa Mbitha, seeks leave to amend the memorandum of appeal in an appeal from the judgment and decree of the Environment and Land Court at Malindi. The amendment is necessary to enable determination of all issues in controversy, particularly regarding the lawful ownership of Plot No. Kili/Mtondia/61 (Mtondia/61).

Issues

  1. Whether the amendment is necessary to enable determination of all issues in controversy
  2. Whether the amendment introduces a totally new ground of appeal

Reasoning

The court considers the nature and extent of the amendment and whether it will assist in the just determination of the real questions in dispute. The application is brought in good faith and is not irrelevant to the appeal.

Outcome

The preliminary objection is dismissed, and the proposed memorandum of appeal is deemed as duly filed and served upon payment of the requisite court fees.

Orders

  • The proposed memorandum of appeal annexed to the application dated 10th November 2022 is deemed as duly filed and served upon payment of the requisite court fees.
  • Each party to bear their own costs.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case