SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lusiti v Republic (Criminal Appeal 310 of 2018) [2024] KECA 1123 (KLR) (30 August 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KECA 1123 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1123
Citation
[2024] KECA 1123 (KLR)
Decided
30 August 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from a conviction and sentence of death for murderCoramJ.K. Sergon, HM Okwengu, H. A. Omondi, JM Ngugi
Holding

The conviction for murder is upheld, but the death sentence is set aside and replaced with a 30-year imprisonment sentence

Facts

The appellant, Paul Kivisi Lusiti, was charged with and convicted of murder of Julius Muchoki. The evidence showed that the appellant arrived at Malakisi Police Station on the night of 9th October 1996, insulted and assaulted his wife, and threatened to kill her. He then shot at Sergeant Julius Muchoki, who died from multiple gunshot wounds.

Issues

  1. Whether the offence of murder was established
  2. Whether the prosecution withheld or suppressed material evidence regarding ballistics opinion
  3. Whether the appellant’s alibi was rejected

Reasoning

The court found that the appellant’s actions were brutal and that the death sentence was excessive. The court also took into account the time spent in remand.

Outcome

The appeal is allowed against the sentence, but not against the conviction

Orders

  • Allow the appeal against the sentence and set aside the death sentence
  • Substitute the sentence with a 30-year imprisonment sentence
  • Take into account the time spent in remand when meting out the sentence

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Penal Code
  • Criminal Procedure Code
Cases cited (2)
  • Francis Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic, Supreme Court of Kenya Petition No. 15 & 16 of 2016
  • Chai vs. Republic (Criminal Appeal 30 of 2020)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case