SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Energy & Petroleum Regulatory Authority (previously known as Energy Regulatory Commission) v Gitson Energy Limited & 5 others (Civil Appeal (Application) E043 of 2022) [2024] KECA 116 (KLR) (9 February 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 116 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
116
Citation
[2024] KECA 116 (KLR)
Decided
9 February 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of execution of judgmentCoramS. GATEMBU KAIRU, F. TUIYOTT, J. LESIIT
Holding

We grant prayer 3 of the application dated 21st February 2022 and order a stay of execution of the judgment of the High Court dated 11th November 2021 and delivered on 15th November 2021 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Facts

The 1st respondent, Gitson Energy Ltd, obtained approval from the Ministry of Energy for a wind power project in Marsabit County, but the Ministry was frustrating the project and discriminating against it. The High Court granted an order of mandamus to compel the Ministry and the Authority to include the project in their list of approved projects and issue appropriate permits.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court erred in granting the orders of mandamus
  2. Whether the intended appeal is frivolous and will be rendered nugatory if the orders are declined

Reasoning

The High Court erred in failing to appreciate that the 1st respondent had not fulfilled conditions precedent for the grant of the licence, including the absence of a feasibility study and availability of land. The intended appeal is not frivolous and the orders sought are proper for the grant of the orders.

Outcome

The application for stay of execution of the judgment of the High Court is granted.

Orders

  • Order a stay of execution of the judgment of the High Court dated 11th November 2021 and delivered on 15th November 2021 pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case