SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MS Advocates LLP v China Wu Yi (Kenya) Co. Ltd (Civil Application E461 of 2023) [2024] KECA 1403 (KLR) (11 October 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 1403 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1403
Citation
[2024] KECA 1403 (KLR)
Decided
11 October 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for extension of time to appealCoramK M'INOTI
Holding

The Court allows the application for extension of time to enable the applicant to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Facts

The applicant, MS Advocates LLP, sought extension of time to appeal from the High Court's ruling on taxation of the Advocate and Client Bill of Costs. The High Court found that the Deputy Registrar had no jurisdiction to tax the Bill of Costs and allowed the application but directed each party to bear its own costs.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has an automatic right of appeal to the Court of Appeal
  2. Whether the applicant was prevented by good reason from taking action within the prescribed time

Reasoning

The Court found that the applicant was not notified of the date of delivery of the ruling and was not aware of the ruling until 24th August 2023, which is slightly over three months after the ruling was delivered. The Court allowed the application as the applicant was candid and honest in explaining the delay.

Outcome

The Court allows the application for extension of time to appeal.

Orders

  • Directs the applicant to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal within 14 days from the date of this ruling

Remedies

  • Costs will abide the outcome of the intended appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Court of Appeal Rules
  • Advocates Remuneration Order
Cases cited (2)
  • Leo Sila Mutiso v. Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi
  • Fakir Mohamed v. Joseph Mugambi & 2 Others
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case