SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wamithi v Republic (Criminal Application E150 of 2024) [2024] KECA 1638 (KLR) (15 November 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 1638 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1638
Citation
[2024] KECA 1638 (KLR)
Decided
15 November 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureApplication for leave to appeal out of timeCoramPM GACHOKA
Holding

The application for leave to appeal out of time is allowed. The applicant shall file his notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of this order, and the record of appeal shall be filed and served within 30 days from the date hereof.

Facts

The applicant, Paul Ngure Wamithi, was charged with delement contrary to section 8(1) as read with section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act in Nakuru CM (SO) case no 77 of 2011. He was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment at the trial court. His appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed by Ngugi, J. on 28th June 2018.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's appeal is timely due to the sentence being contrary to several Articles of the Constitution
  2. Whether the applicant's absence at the judgment delivery and lack of timely proceedings are valid reasons for the appeal

Reasoning

The Court considered the reasons advanced by the applicant, the supporting affidavit, and the respondent's concession to the application. The Court found that the application has met the threshold for the exercise of discretion.

Outcome

The application for leave to appeal out of time is allowed.

Orders

  • The applicant shall file his notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of this order.
  • The record of appeal shall be filed and served within 30 days from the date hereof.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case