SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Abdulahi v National Land Commission & 6 others (Civil Appeal 113 of 2018) [2024] KECA 183 (KLR) (23 February 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KECA 183 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
183
Citation
[2024] KECA 183 (KLR)
Decided
23 February 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Environment and Land CourtCoramM. WARSAME, K. M'INOTI, J. MATIVO
Holding

The appeal is dismissed. The court is not persuaded that the appeal has merit.

Facts

The appellant filed an ex parte Chamber summons application seeking leave to institute judicial review proceedings against the respondents, alleging that they allowed a 7th respondent to use members of the National Police Service for his private matters and to forcefully take possession of the suit property.

Issues

  1. Whether the court could enlarge time for filing of the substantive motion and deem the motion filed out of time as properly on record.
  2. Whether the court had jurisdiction to consider an application filed out of the stipulated period.

Reasoning

The court found that the application was filed way after the lapse of time, when the appellant had already filed the substantive notice of motion. The court was not persuaded to extend time that had already lapsed, and the application to enlarge time appeared to be an afterthought.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The costs of the appeal are awarded to the 2nd and 7th respondents.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Zacharia Okoth Obado v Edward Akong’o Oyugi & 2 Others [2014] eKLR
  • Charles Karanja Kuru v Charles Githinji Muigwa (CA 71/2016)
  • Martha Wambui v Irene Wanjiru Mwangi & Another
  • Nicholas Arap Korir Salat v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 Others [2014] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case