Taj Mall Limited v Taj Millenium Management Limited (Civil Appeal (Application) E189 of 2024) [2024] KECA 1934 (KLR) (20 December 2024) (Ruling)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 1934
- Citation
- [2024] KECA 1934 (KLR)
- Decided
- 20 December 2024
The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent as the applicant has not proffered any reason for the delay in excess of five months.
Facts
The applicant, Taj Mall Limited, was aggrieved by the judgment of the Environment and Land Court dated 28th October 2021 in ELC No. 721 of 2012. The applicant instructed its lawyers to lodge a notice of appeal, but due to inadvertence, the notice of appeal was not served within the statutory seven days. The applicant also faced a delay in obtaining the proceedings and judgment, which resulted in a certificate of delay dated 28th September 2023.
Issues
- Whether the Court should grant the applicant extension of time to serve the notice of appeal and file the record of appeal
- Whether the applicant's appeal is competent and worth entertaining by the Court
Reasoning
The Court found that the applicant did not serve the notice of appeal within the statutory seven days and did not file the record of appeal within the statutory sixty days. The applicant attributed the delay to failure to obtain certificated copies of the proceedings and inadvertence on the part of its advocates. The Court found the delay to be inordinate and dismissed the application.
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Loading judgment…