SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mogwanja & another v Roskan Investments Limited & 3 others (Civil Appeal (Application) 4 of 2019) [2024] KECA 242 (KLR) (8 March 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 242 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
242
Citation
[2024] KECA 242 (KLR)
Decided
8 March 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureApplication for leave to appeal from the Court of Appeal to the Supreme CourtCoramASIKE-MAKHANDIA, P. NYAMWEYA, J. MATIVO, JUDGE OF APPEAL
Holding

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Facts

The applicants, Pauline Njoki Mogwanja and Sheila Wariara Karago, along with their deceased brother James Mirie, inherited a property known as 'the Island Farm' from their parents. James, who was denied a share, approached the sisters for permission to use the property. The property was later sold by James to the 1st respondent, who is a private limited liability company with the applicants and the 2nd respondent as shareholders and directors.

Issues

  1. Interpretation of the testatrix's will
  2. Constructive trust
  3. Fraudulent sale of the property

Reasoning

The issues raised by the applicants do not meet the threshold and criteria for public interest as they were not raised in the trial or appellate courts. The issues are not of general public importance and do not warrant the intervention of the Supreme Court.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Notice of Motion dated 20th April 2023 is dismissed with costs to the respondents

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Jamii Bora Bank Limited v Minnie Mbue [2021] eKLR
  • Hermanus Phillipus Steyn v. Giovanni Gnecchi Ruscone (supra)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case