SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kipyego & another v Kiyuk (Civil Application E041 of 2023) [2024] KECA 263 (KLR) (8 March 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 263 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
263
Citation
[2024] KECA 263 (KLR)
Decided
8 March 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication to strike out notice of appealCoramL.N. Waithaka, F. Sichahe, F. Ochieng, W. Korir
Holding

The applicants' application to strike out the notice of appeal is allowed.

Facts

The 1st and 2nd applicants (Kipyego and Choge) sought to strike out the respondent's (Kiyuk) notice of appeal filed against the judgment of the Environment and Land Court (E&LC) at Iten. The notice of appeal was filed and served out of time.

Issues

  1. Whether the notice of appeal was filed out of time.
  2. Whether the applicants' application was made within 30 days as required by the Court of Appeal Rules.

Reasoning

The notice of appeal was filed 25 days after the judgment was delivered, which is out of time. The applicants argued that the respondent was present during the judgment and should have filed the notice of appeal within time. The court held that Rule 77(2) is mandatory and a notice of appeal once filed out of time cannot be sanctioned by the court but must be struck out.

Outcome

The respondent's notice of appeal dated 20th July 2023 and lodged in the registry on 21st July 2023 is hereby struck out.

Orders

  • The respondent's notice of appeal is struck out.

Remedies

  • The respondent shall meet the applicants' costs of the application.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Court of Appeal Rules
  • Rules of the Court
Cases cited (1)
  • Mistry Premji Ganji (Investments) Ltd v. Kenya National Highways Authority [2019] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case