SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nthiga v Keeru & 2 others (Civil Application 19 of 2020) [2024] KECA 320 (KLR) (22 March 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 320 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
320
Citation
[2024] KECA 320 (KLR)
Decided
22 March 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureAppeal from the judgment of P.M. Njoroge, J. dated and delivered at Chuka on the 4th December, 2019 in Chuka E.L.C No. 9 of 2018CoramW. KARANJA, JAMILA MOHAMMED, LK KIMARU, P.M. Njoroge
Holding

The application for a stay of the judgment of the CMCC is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Facts

The appellant, Grace Cianjoka Nthiga, is challenging the judgment of the Chief Magistrate's Court (CMCC) in CMCC No. 124 of 2016, where she was ordered to give 1.125 acres of land to her daughters, who are the respondents. The appellant has appealed this judgment to the High Court, which dismissed the appeal. The appellant now seeks a stay of the judgment of the CMCC pending the appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant's application for a stay of the judgment of the CMCC is arguable.
  2. Whether the judgment of the CMCC is capable of being stayed due to its nature as a negative order.

Reasoning

The court found that the judgment of the CMCC is a negative order incapable of execution and thus, cannot be stayed. The court also noted that the appellant has not prayed for an injunction or any other orders.

Outcome

The application for a stay of the judgment of the CMCC is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Western College of Arts and Applied Sciences v EP Oranga & 3 others [1976] eKLR
  • Raymond M. Omboga vs. Austine Pyan Maranga Kisii HCCA No 15 of 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case