SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya National Commission for Unesco & another v Cabinet Secretary for Education & 2 others; Lentoijoni & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Civil Application E044 of 2023) [2024] KECA 67 (KLR) (2 February 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 67 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
67
Citation
[2024] KECA 67 (KLR)
Decided
2 February 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for stay of execution of judgmentCoramP. NYAMWEYA, F. OCHIENG, W. KORIR
Holding

The application is dismissed as the applicants have not proved the nugatory aspect of the application and there is no basis for staying the judgment.

Facts

The Kenya National Commission for UNESCO and Dr. Evangeline Njoka filed an appeal against the trial court's judgment, but the respondents initiated the removal of the 2nd applicant from office, which they claim will adversely affect the operations of the 1st applicant.

Issues

  1. Whether the execution of the judgment will adversely affect the operations of the 1st applicant
  2. Whether the removal of the 2nd applicant from office before the end of her term will stall the activities of the Board
  3. Whether the intended appeal is arguable and has high chances of success
  4. Whether the execution of the judgment will halt the operations of the 1st applicant thereby subjecting the applicants to irreparable damages

Reasoning

The applicants failed to prove the nugatory aspect of the application. The trial court's judgment saved the actions of the 2nd applicant, left the 1st applicant's Board quorate, and the 2nd applicant's term has since come to an end.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Kenya National Commission for UNESCO Act, 2013
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case