SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jubat v Laton & 5 others; Obunga (Proposed Interested Party) (Civil Appeal (Application) E063 of 2023) [2024] KECA 68 (KLR) (2 February 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 68 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
68
Citation
[2024] KECA 68 (KLR)
Decided
2 February 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication to be enjoined as the 1st Interested Party in Nakuru Court of Appeal, Civil Appeal No. E063 of 2023CoramASIKE-MAKHANDIA, FA OCHIENG, WK KORIR
Holding

The applicant is joined as an interested party in the appeal and is granted leave to file a response.

Facts

The applicant, Zephaniah Obunga, sought to be enjoined as an interested party in Nakuru Civil Appeal No. E063 of 2023, an appeal arising from the judgment of Environment and Land Court (E&LC) at Kilgoris in E&LC No. 26 of 2021. The E&LC nullified and cancelled the title to the property known as Transmara/Enaenyieny/672, which the applicant claims he is the sole registered owner of.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has a sufficient stake, interest, and relevance in the pending appeal.
  2. Whether the applicant should be allowed to be joined as an interested party in the appeal to protect his constitutional rights and avoid violation of the rules of natural justice.

Reasoning

The applicant has established his stake, interest, and relevance in the appeal. The court finds that admitting the applicant as an interested party is in consonance with the objectives of joinder of parties, including ensuring complete settlement of all questions involved in the dispute and protecting the rights of a party who would otherwise be adversely affected in law.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • The applicant is joined as an interested party in the appeal (Nakuru Civil Appeal No. E063 of 2023).
  • Directions on the filing of a response by the applicant shall be as will be issued in the appeal.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case