SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Heguda v Republic (Criminal Appeal E111 of 2023) [2024] KECA 735 (KLR) (21 June 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KECA 735 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
735
Citation
[2024] KECA 735 (KLR)
Decided
21 June 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from a High Court ruling on an application for leave to appeal out of timeCoramA. K. Murgor, Dr. K. I. Laibuata, G. V. Oduanga
Holding

The Court allows the appeal, quashes the convictions, and orders the appellant to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.

Facts

The appellant, Hiribae Kokane Hekuda, filed a Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. E025 of 2023 in the High Court of Kenya at Garsen seeking leave to file an appeal out of time. He claimed he was not able to file his appeal due to the judgment of the Trial court not being supplied to him in time.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant was heard before the learned Judge made his decision to dismiss his application
  2. Whether the High Court had the authority to summarily reject the appellant's application for leave to appeal out of time

Reasoning

The Court found that the learned Judge erred by acting without jurisdiction when he dismissed the appellant's application without hearing any of the parties who were before him.

Outcome

The appeal is allowed, the convictions are quashed, and the appellant is ordered to be set at liberty.

Orders

  • Remit the application to the High Court for full hearing
  • Set the application down for hearing by a Judge other than Githinji, J. on a priority basis

Remedies

  • Quashing of convictions and release of the appellant

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Criminal Appeal Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Washingstone Walimulu s/o Masa v Republic
  • Wilson Maina Murage v R
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case