SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union v Praying Mantis Limited (Civil Application E034 of 2022) [2024] KECA 788 (KLR) (5 July 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KECA 788 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
788
Citation
[2024] KECA 788 (KLR)
Decided
5 July 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication to deem Notice of Appeal withdrawn and to strike out the record of appealCoramHM OKWENGU, H. A. OMONDI, JOEL NGUGI
Holding

The application is granted, the record of appeal is struck out and the notice of appeal is deemed withdrawn with costs to the applicant.

Facts

The Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union filed a suit against Praying Mantis Limited in the Employment and Labour Relations Court, alleging unfair termination of employment and demanding reinstatement or payment of terminal dues. The Employment and Labour Relations Court found the termination unfair and awarded terminal dues, interest, and costs.

Issues

  1. Whether the Notice of Appeal was filed within the prescribed time
  2. Whether the respondent failed to serve the letter requesting typed proceedings and the judgment of the High Court

Reasoning

The respondent failed to lodge an appeal within the prescribed 60-day time frame and did not serve the applicant with the requested letter. The appeal is deemed an abuse of the court process.

Outcome

The record of appeal is struck out and the notice of appeal is deemed withdrawn.

Orders

  • Record of appeal dated 14th February, 2022 is struck out
  • Notice of appeal dated 22nd February, 2021 is deemed withdrawn

Remedies

  • Costs to the applicant

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Appellate Jurisdiction Act
  • Court of Appeal Rules 2010/2022
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case