SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Railways Corporation v Telkom Kenya Limited (Civil Appeal 423 of 2018) [2024] KECA 9 (KLR) (25 January 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KECA 9 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
9
Citation
[2024] KECA 9 (KLR)
Decided
25 January 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the High Court of Kenya at NairobiCoramA., Bowen L., Chesoni, JM MATIVO, JUDGE OF APPEAL, Onguto
Holding

The court held that the applicable statute of limitations is Section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act, not Section 87 of the Kenya Railways Corporation Act.

Facts

Telkom Kenya Limited sued Kenya Railways Corporation for Kshs.271,100,360.92 in PSTN and data-oriented telecommunication services from the late 1980s to November 2006. The appellant denied liability and claimed the claim was time-barred.

Issues

  1. Whether the claim was time-barred
  2. Which statute of limitations applies: Section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act or Section 87 of the Kenya Railways Corporation Act

Reasoning

The court found that the Limitation of Actions Act, enacted in 1967, generally applies to actions in tort and contract, while Section 87 of the Kenya Railways Corporation Act specifically applies to actions against the appellant. The court concluded that the claims would be barred by statute upon expiry of 6 years from the time Telkom was entitled to obtain a remedy against KRC.

Outcome

Affirmed the High Court's decision.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Limitation of Actions Act
  • Kenya Railways Corporation Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case