SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Emuria v Sambu & 2 others (Civil Appeal 63 of 2017) [2025] KECA 1033 (KLR) (5 June 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECA 1033 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1033
Citation
[2025] KECA 1033 (KLR)
Decided
5 June 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment and decree of the Environment and Land Court of KenyaCoramE.Obaga, Githinji, PM Gachoka
Holding

The appeal has merit, and the judgment of the trial court is set aside. The respondents are evicted from the suit premises and restrained from trespassing onto or interfering with the appellant's quiet possession and occupation of the land.

Facts

The appellant, Emuria, bought one acre of land from Malakwen Arap Serem in 2001. In 2007, the son of the seller, Elijah Kiptanui Sambu, threatened and destroyed the fence, occupying part of the land. The appellant sued for eviction and an injunction.

Issues

  1. The necessity of proper pleadings and setting out of the cause of action.
  2. Whether the appellant's suit was wrongly dismissed by the trial court.

Reasoning

The court found that the respondents' claim was based on a counterclaim for cancellation or rectification of the title, which was not pursued. The court determined that the appellant should hold a title for 1.3 acres but is only entitled to use 1.1 acres, while the respondents occupy 0.2 acres without title.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The respondents be evicted from the suit premises.
  • A permanent injunction be and is hereby issued restraining the respondents from trespassing onto or interfering with the appellant's quiet possession and occupation of the suit land.

Remedies

  • The appellant is entitled to the costs in the ELC and in this appeal together with interest thereon.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case