SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

AKK v Republic (Criminal Appeal 55 of 2019) [2025] KECA 1144 (KLR) (20 June 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECA 1144 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1144
Citation
[2025] KECA 1144 (KLR)
Decided
20 June 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from a conviction and sentenceCoramR.P.V. Wendoh, W.K. Korir
Holding

The appeal is dismissed in its entirety.

Facts

The appellant, AKK, was charged with incest and indecent act with a minor. The complainant, L.W.K., alleged that the appellant committed incest and indecent act with her. The appellant was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Issues

  1. Whether the learned Judge failed to consider the existence of bad blood between the appellant and the complainant's mother.
  2. Whether the elements of the offence were proved.
  3. Whether the learned Judge erred in relying on section 124 of the Evidence Act.
  4. Whether a crucial witness was not called to testify.
  5. Whether the first appellate court did not properly discharge its mandate.
  6. Whether the appellant's defence was not considered.

Reasoning

The court found no reference to section 124 of the Evidence Act by the learned Judge. The evidence of the complainant was corroborated by medical evidence, allowing for conviction. The concurrent findings of fact by the two courts below were upheld. The sentence was upheld as the complainant was a child and the trial court had the authority to pass the life sentence.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Sexual Offences Act
  • Evidence Act
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Sexual Offences Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Mukungu vs Republic (2002) EA 482
  • Thomas Mwambu Wenyi vs. Republic [2017] KECA 756 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case