SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Aberdare Wire Products Limited v Tarmal Wire Products Limited (Civil Appeal (Application) E154 of 2021) [2025] KECA 1154 (KLR) (20 June 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 1154 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1154
Citation
[2025] KECA 1154 (KLR)
Decided
20 June 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureApplication for stay of executionCoramW. KARANJA, S. GATEMBU KAIRU, L. ACHODE
Holding

The application dated 15th October 2021 fails. It is dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Facts

The parties were in a trading relationship. The respondent, Tarmal Wire Products Limited, claimed that the applicant, Aberdare Wire Products Limited, defaulted in payment for goods supplied on credit. The applicant denied the claim and applied to strike out the defence as a sham and an abuse of the court process.

Issues

  1. Whether the appeal is arguable and has high chances of success
  2. Whether the application meets the threshold in Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui vs. Tony Ketter & 5 others [2013] eKLR
  3. Whether the appeal will be rendered nugatory if the Court fails to grant the orders sought

Reasoning

The Court found that the appeal is not frivolous but dismissed it as the applicant has not demonstrated that the appeal will be rendered nugatory if the orders sought are declined.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui vs. Tony Ketter & 5 others [2013] eKLR
  • Githunguri vs. Jimba Credit Corporation Limited No.2 [1988] eKLR
  • Trust Bank Limited & Another vs. Investech Bank Limited & 3 Others [2000] KECA 11(KLR)
  • Registered Trustees, Kenya Railways Sta Retirement Benets Scheme vs. Millimo, Muthomi & Company Advocates & 2 Others [2022] KECA 491 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case