SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sciborski v Golden Century Limited (Civil Application E367 of 2024) [2025] KECA 1163 (KLR) (20 June 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 1163 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1163
Citation
[2025] KECA 1163 (KLR)
Decided
20 June 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication for Extension of Time to file a Notice of AppealCoramF. SICHALE, JA
Holding

The court allowed the motion for extension of time, deeming the Notice of Appeal as duly filed and extending the time to serve it on the respondent.

Facts

The appellant, Prof. Romuald J. Sciborski, sought an extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal against the ruling and orders of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Mongare J), dated 12th February 2024, in Milimani Commercial & Tax Division Misc Case No. E068 of 2023. The appellant's advocates filed a Notice of Appeal on 14th February 2024 but were unable to serve it on the respondent due to delays in obtaining a stamped copy from the Registry.

Issues

  1. Whether the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal was justifiable
  2. Whether the motion for extension of time should be granted

Reasoning

The court found that the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal was due to the Registry's failure to provide a stamped copy of the judgment and proceedings, and that the reasons given for the delay were reasonable.

Outcome

The motion for extension of time was granted.

Orders

  • The Notice of Appeal filed on 14th February, 2024, and served on 16th July, 2024, is deemed to have been properly served.
  • The applicant shall proceed to file the intended appeal within 30 days from the date of this ruling, failure to which, these orders shall stand vacated.

Remedies

  • Extension of time to file the Notice of Appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Appellate Jurisdiction Act
  • Court of Appeal Rules 2022
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case