SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

State Law Office v Kibira (Civil Application E546 of 2024) [2025] KECA 1307 (KLR) (18 July 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 1307 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1307
Citation
[2025] KECA 1307 (KLR)
Decided
18 July 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication for leave to file an appeal out of timeCoramJM NGUGI, Lady Justice
Holding

The application is allowed in terms of prayer 1 only, granting leave to file and serve a Record of Appeal within fourteen (14) days of today.

Facts

The respondent sought compensation for demolition of her buildings on a parcel of land due to the Ministry of Defence's order, which was based on aviation safety regulations and other legal violations. The applicant filed a Notice of Appeal but did not meet the statutory timelines.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's application for leave to file an appeal out of time should be granted
  2. Whether the respondent has demonstrated specific prejudice that would result from the grant of the application

Reasoning

The delay in filing the appeal is approximately four months, not inordinate, and the applicant's position before the trial court was that the demolition was necessary for aviation safety. The respondent has not demonstrated specific prejudice, and the application is granted to allow the matter to proceed to appellate determination.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • Leave granted to file and serve a Record of Appeal within fourteen (14) days of today

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Court of Appeal Rules
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (1)
  • Leo Sila Mutiso v Hellen Wangari Mwangi [1999] 2 EA 231
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case