SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mwinyi v Bhai & another (Civil Appeal E023 of 2023) [2025] KECA 1309 (KLR) (18 July 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECA 1309 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1309
Citation
[2025] KECA 1309 (KLR)
Decided
18 July 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of the Environment and Land Court of Kenya at MombasaCoramGW NGENYE-MACHARIA, Lord Maule, Nyarangi, O. Kiage, Ouko, Yano
Holding

The appeal is partially successful, with the award of mesne profits set aside. The respondents are entitled to damages.

Facts

The respondents claim that the appellant purchased a house without land on their plot, which was later used for construction. The respondents allege wrongful entry, trespass, and failure to vacate the plot, leading to a claim for mesne profits and damages.

Issues

  1. Validity of the appellant's purchase of the house without land
  2. Responsibility for the construction on the respondents' plot
  3. Award of mesne profits and damages

Reasoning

The court held that the appellant's actions constituted trespass and awarded damages for trespass, but not mesne profits as the respondents did not prove they suffered damages.

Outcome

The appeal is partially successful, with the award of mesne profits set aside.

Orders

  • Delivery of the suit plot in vacant possession by the appellant to the respondents
  • An injunction to restrain the appellant from continuing construction on the suit plot
  • A mandatory injunction to demolish and remove all structures erected on the suit plot

Remedies

  • Damages

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Kenya Power & Lighting Company Ltd vs. Ringera & 2 others (Civil Appeal E247 & E248 of 2020 (Consolidated)) [2022] KECA 104 (KLR) (4 February 2022)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case