SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Emfil Limited v Safaricom Limited (Civil Appeal E100 of 2022) [2025] KECA 1331 (KLR) (18 July 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECA 1331 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1331
Citation
[2025] KECA 1331 (KLR)
Decided
18 July 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment and Decree of the Environment and Land Court of Kenya at MombasaCoramGW NGENYE-MACHARIA, Lord Maule, Maureen Odero, Munyao, Munyao Sila, Omollo, Yano
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent, and the judgment of the Environment and Land Court is upheld.

Facts

Emfil Limited filed a suit against Safaricom Limited in the Environment and Land Court of Kenya at Mombasa, claiming that Safaricom Limited had installed a mast on land registered in the name of Jua Maisha Limited without permission. Safaricom Limited claimed the land was theirs.

Issues

  1. Whether Safaricom Limited had the right to install the mast on the land
  2. Whether the Environment and Land Court erred in not awarding mesne profits

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent did not have a relationship with the appellant regarding the suit property and that the appellant did not demonstrate a relationship with Jua Maisha Limited. The claim for mesne profits was not sustainable as there was no proof of economic activity on the property and the respondent vacated the premises.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case