SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Abdi v National Bank of Kenya Limited; Abdi (Interested Party) (Civil Application E178 of 2025) [2025] KECA 1460 (KLR) (31 July 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 1460 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1460
Citation
[2025] KECA 1460 (KLR)
Decided
31 July 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for extension of time to file the record of appealCoramJ. MOHAMMED
Holding

The Court granted the application for extension of time to file the record of appeal.

Facts

Mariam Abdi filed a notice of motion seeking an extension of time to file the record of appeal against the judgment of the High Court delivered on September 28, 2022. The respondent is National Bank of Kenya Limited, and Ali Mohamed Abdi is an interested party.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has a good explanation for the delay in filing the appeal
  2. Whether the delay is inordinate
  3. Whether the respondent will suffer prejudice if an extension of time is granted
  4. Whether the intended appeal has good prospects of success

Reasoning

The Court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time, considering the applicant's explanation for the delay and the lack of prejudice to the respondent.

Outcome

The Court granted the application for extension of time to file the record of appeal.

Orders

  • Extension of time to file the record of appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Court of Appeal Rules
Cases cited (3)
  • Fakir Mohamed v Joseph Mugambi & 2 others [2005] eKLR
  • Bains Construction Co. Ltd. –v- John Mzare Ogowe [2011] eKLR
  • Habo Agencies Limited –v- Wilfred Odhiambo Musingo [2015] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case