SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Matheka v Intercontinental Consultants & Technocrats PVT Limited (Civil Application E707 of 2024) [2025] KECA 1584 (KLR) (3 October 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 1584 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1584
Citation
[2025] KECA 1584 (KLR)
Decided
3 October 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for extension of time to file and serve a Notice of AppealCoramP. NYAMWEYA
Holding

The application for extension of time is found to be merited, and the applicant is granted leave to file and serve a Notice of Appeal within fourteen (14) days of the date of delivery of this ruling.

Facts

The applicant sought an extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal against a ruling by the Employment and Labour Relations Court, which held that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the applicant's orders.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court
  2. Reasonable cause for not filing the appeal in time

Reasoning

The court considered the length of delay and the reason for the delay, finding that the delay was sufficiently explained and not inordinate. The court also noted that the applicant has a right to appeal to this Court.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file and serve a Notice of Appeal against the ruling within fourteen (14) days of the date of delivery of this ruling.
  • Each party shall meet their own costs of the application.

Remedies

  • Extension of time to file and serve a Notice of Appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wangare Mwangi (1999) 2 EA 231
  • Andrew Kiplagat Chemaringo v Paul Kipkorir Kibet (2018) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case