SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Tim v Koima & 9 others (Civil Application E033 of 2025) [2025] KECA 1799 (KLR) (31 October 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 1799 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
1799
Citation
[2025] KECA 1799 (KLR)
Decided
31 October 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for extension of time to file and serve a Notice of AppealCoramMA WARSAME
Holding

The Court grants the application for extension of time, finding the delay to be minimal and reasonable given the applicant's age and emotional state.

Facts

The applicant, Dr. Samson K.A. Tim, sought an extension of time to file and serve a Notice of Appeal against the judgment and decree of the High Court dated 28th February 2025 in Nakuru High Court Succession Cause No. 57 of 2008 due to a delay caused by his collapse after learning of the judgment.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's delay in filing the Notice of Appeal was reasonable given his age and health condition.
  2. Whether the intended appeal raises serious questions of both law and fact and has a high chance of succeeding.

Reasoning

The Court considered the length of the delay, the applicant's explanation for the delay, and the potential merits of the appeal. The Court found the delay to be reasonable and granted the application.

Outcome

The application for extension of time to file and serve a Notice of Appeal is granted.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Appellate Jurisdiction Act, Cap. 9
  • Court of Appeal Rules 2022
Cases cited (2)
  • Abdul Aziz Ngoma v. Mungai Mathayo [1976] eKLR
  • Fakir Mohamed v. Joseph Mugambi & two others, Civil Application No. Nai. 332/04
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case