SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ntoburi (Suing as Legal Representative of Ntoburi Ithibutu & another v Lands Adjudication and Settlement Officer, Igembe & 7 others (Civil Appeal 116 of 2018) [2025] KECA 180 (KLR) (7 February 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECA 180 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
180
Citation
[2025] KECA 180 (KLR)
Decided
7 February 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureFirst AppealCoramELC, KARANJA, KARAN, LK KIMARU, L. Mbugua
Holding

The Court of Appeal upheld the judgment of the ELC, finding that the adjudication process and issuance of titles did not leave parcel No. LR. NO. Ithima/Antuambui/5157 landlocked without an access road and that the acreage on the title deeds does not differ from the acreage on the adjudication register.

Facts

The appellants claim that the adjudication process, registration, and issuance of titles for three parcels of land (LR. NO. Ithima/Antuambui/2406, 2424, and 5157) left parcel No. LR. NO. Ithima/Antuambui/5157 landlocked without an access road and that the acreage on the title deeds differs from the acreage on the adjudication register.

Issues

  1. Whether the adjudication process and issuance of titles for the parcels of land left parcel No. LR. NO. Ithima/Antuambui/5157 landlocked without an access road.
  2. Whether the acreage on the title deeds for the parcels of land differs from the acreage on the adjudication register.

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal reviewed the evidence and found that the adjudication process and issuance of titles did not result in the parcel being landlocked without an access road, and that the acreage on the title deeds is consistent with the acreage on the adjudication register.

Outcome

Affirmed

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case