Mwangi v Equity Bank Kenya Ltd & 2 others (Civil Application E267 of 2025) [2025] KECA 1815 (KLR) (7 November 2025) (Ruling)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 1815
- Citation
- [2025] KECA 1815 (KLR)
- Decided
- 7 November 2025
The application for temporary injunction is dismissed as not urgent.
Facts
The applicant, Simon P. Mwangi, bought a property in 1997 and constructed a building on it. The 3rd respondent, Rorete Estate Limited, had previously bought the property from Halai Developers Limited and obtained title. The 1st respondent, Equity Bank Kenya Ltd., sold the property to the 2nd respondent, Joseph G. Muturi T/A Muga Auctioneers & General Merchants, to recover a loan. The applicant sought a declaration that the property belonged to him and an injunction to prevent the respondents from selling or auctioning the property.
Issues
- Whether the application for temporary injunction is urgent
- Whether the applicant should be accorded preferential treatment for his application to be listed for urgent consideration
Reasoning
The applicant did not disclose why he should be accorded preferential treatment for his application to be listed for urgent consideration in the face of other applications that were filed earlier and were queuing, some of them for a very long time. The established principle is that applications are heard on first come first heard basis.
Outcome
The application for temporary injunction is dismissed.
Loading judgment…