SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nkaangi v Kilonzi & 3 others (Civil Application E193 of 2025) [2025] KECA 2064 (KLR) (5 December 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 2064 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
2064
Citation
[2025] KECA 2064 (KLR)
Decided
5 December 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication for Extension of Time to Lodge a Notice of AppealCoramF. SICHALE, JA
Holding

The court dismissed the applicant's motion for extension of time to lodge a Notice of Appeal, finding that the reasons given for the delay were not reasonable and that the applicant had not satisfied the existence of principles for consideration in the exercise of the court's discretion.

Facts

The applicant, Nkaangi, sought to extend the time to lodge a Notice of Appeal against a judgment of the Environment and Land Court dated 13th April 2018. The judgment was in Machakos ELC Case No. 412 of 2012. The applicant claimed he was not notified of the judgment and thus delayed in filing the appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's delay in filing the appeal was reasonable
  2. Whether the applicant has demonstrated the existence of principles for consideration in the exercise of the court's discretion to extend time

Reasoning

The court found that the delay of about 7 years was inordinate and that the applicant's reasons for the delay were not reasonable. The court also noted that the applicant had not demonstrated the existence of principles for consideration in the exercise of the court's discretion.

Outcome

The motion for extension of time to lodge a Notice of Appeal was dismissed.

Orders

  • The motion for extension of time to lodge a Notice of Appeal is dismissed in its entirety with no order as to costs.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Mwangi v Kenya Airways Limited (2003) KLR 486
  • Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi (Civil Application No. Nai 255 of 1997)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case