SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nderitu v Republic (Criminal Appeal 123 of 2017) [2025] KECA 2187 (KLR) (11 December 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECA 2187 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
2187
Citation
[2025] KECA 2187 (KLR)
Decided
11 December 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureSecond AppealCoramS. ole KANTAI, A. ALI-ARONI, G. V. ODUNGA
Holding

We allow the appeal by quashing the conviction and setting aside the sentence. The appellant shall be set free forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.

Facts

The appellant, John Ngunjiri Nderitu, was charged with delement contrary to section 8(1)(3) of the Sexual Offences Act. The child, EW, aged 14, alleged that the appellant intentionally caused his penis to penetrate her vagina between December 15 and 31, 2015. The child's mother reported the incident to the police, and the appellant was arrested. The child was found to be pregnant, and DNA tests confirmed the appellant's paternity.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant was accorded a fair trial
  2. Whether a retrial is necessary given the appellant's long period in custody

Reasoning

The court found that the appellant did not receive a fair trial due to his long period in custody and the lack of proper legal representation. The court concluded that ordering a retrial would not be in the best interest of justice and the appellant.

Outcome

Appeal allowed, conviction and sentence quashed

Orders

  • The appellant shall be set free forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
Cases cited (2)
  • Martin Bahati Makoha & Another vs. Republic
  • Muiruri vs. Republic
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case