SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ndegwa & another v Khaemba & 3 others (Civil Appeal (Application) E093 of 2023) [2025] KECA 2322 (KLR) (19 December 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 2322 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
2322
Citation
[2025] KECA 2322 (KLR)
Decided
19 December 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil Appeal (Application)PostureApplication for extension of time to strike out a notice and record of appealCoramDK MUSINGA
Holding

The application is allowed and the time for filing an application to strike out the appeal is extended by 14 days from the date of this ruling.

Facts

The appellants filed the notice of appeal on 20th January 2023 and the record of appeal on 15th May 2025, which was 117 days outside the prescribed period. The applicants instructed Majan Maitethia & Associates Advocates to represent them and filed an application to strike out the appeal, but the advocates failed to do so. The applicants engaged M/s Mwangi & Ngatia Advocates who discovered that the previous advocates had entered into a consent for stay of execution of the judgment without authority of the applicants.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicants have advanced compelling reasons for the delay in filing their application outside the 30 days' statutory period under rule 86.
  2. Whether the applicants have established any fraud on the part of the appellants or their advocates in relation to the consent recorded on 1st November, 2023.

Reasoning

The applicants have explained the delay in filing the application and have not been prejudiced by the delay. The applicants earnestly desire to pursue the striking out of an improper appeal.

Outcome

The application is allowed.

Orders

  • Extension of time for filing an application to strike out the appeal by 14 days from the date of this ruling.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case