SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mas Construction Limited v Sheikh & 6 others (Civil Appeal E789 of 2023) [2025] KECA 349 (KLR) (28 February 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECA 349 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
349
Citation
[2025] KECA 349 (KLR)
Decided
28 February 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of the Environment and Land Court of KenyaCoramD. K. MUSINGA, K. M'INOTI, F. OCHIENG
Holding

The trial court's judgment is upheld, and the appeal is dismissed with costs to the 1st and 2nd respondents against the appellant, 3rd and 4th respondents, jointly and severally.

Facts

The 1st and 2nd respondents, Abdul Waheed Sheikh and Abdul Hameed Sheikh, filed a suit in the Environment and Land Court against the appellant and the 3rd to 7th respondents. They claimed ownership of a parcel of land located along 1st Parklands Avenue within Nairobi. The appellant and the 5th respondent entered the property and took possession of the furniture, goods, and chattels. The suit was filed in 2014.

Issues

  1. Ownership of the land
  2. Validity of the appellant's title

Reasoning

The court found that the appellant's title was procured through fraud and that the demolition of the house on the property was a fraudulent act. The court ordered the appellant to pay Kshs.10,000,000 for the demolition of the house.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Costs to the 1st and 2nd respondents

Remedies

  • Kshs.10,000,000 for the demolition of the house

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Chief Land Registrar & 4 others v Nathan Tirop Koech & 4 others [2018] eKLR
  • Torino Enterprises Limited vs Attorney General (Petition 5) (E006) of 2022 [2023] KESC 79 (KLR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case