SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

HHI Management Services Limited v Okeyo & another (Civil Application E341 of 2024) [2025] KECA 501 (KLR) (21 March 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KECA 501 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
501
Citation
[2025] KECA 501 (KLR)
Decided
21 March 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureAppeal from a ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramJAMILA MOHAMMED, JUDGE OF APPEAL MUMBI NGUGI, F. OCHIENG
Holding

The application is dismissed with costs.

Facts

HHI Management Services Limited filed an application seeking to stay the proceedings in the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) Cause No. E970 of 2023, alleging that the court's ruling against arbitration clauses in the employment contract was inconsistent with constitutional provisions and previous court decisions.

Issues

  1. Whether arbitral clauses in employment contracts are enforceable.
  2. Whether the ELRC erred by effectively rewriting the contract between the parties.
  3. Whether the ELRC erred in concluding that arbitral law in Kenya is primarily intended for commercial disputes.
  4. Whether the ELRC erred in finding that the inclusion of arbitration clauses in employment contracts is atypical and less favourable than litigation.

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant failed to show arguable grounds for appeal and that the matter should not be stayed. The court also concluded that the ELRC did not err in its interpretation of the arbitration clauses and the dispute resolution mechanism.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Multimedia University of Kenya v Professor Gitile N. Naituli (2014) eKLR
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Lillian S' v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd (1989) eKLR
  • Dock Workers Union Limited v Messina Kenya Limited eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case