SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mwangi & 3 others v Ngarachu (Sued as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Ngarachu Chege - Deceased) (Civil Appeal 328 of 2019) [2025] KECA 555 (KLR) (21 March 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KECA 555 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
555
Citation
[2025] KECA 555 (KLR)
Decided
21 March 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment and decree of the Environment and Land Court at Murang’aCoramAO MUCHELULE, J.G. Kemei, KARAN, W. KARAN
Holding

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and upheld the judgment of the Environment and Land Court.

Facts

The appellants claim an easement over land measuring 58 meters by 3 meters, which they claim was excised by the respondent's husband in his lifetime. The respondent denies the claim and states that the appellants' parcels have access to the main road through the road below their land.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellants are entitled to an easement over the land parcel No Loc.8/Kaganda/73
  2. Whether the appellants are entitled to a declaration that Ngarachu Chege held the property subject of the easement in trust for the appellants
  3. Whether the deceased's title in respect of the said portion of 58m long by 3m wide in Loc.8/Kaganda/73 is extinguished under section 17 of the Limitations of Actions Act
  4. Whether the applicants are entitled to be registered as the owners of the easement measuring 58m long by 3m wide over land parcel No Loc.8/Kaganda/73
  5. Whether the costs of this suit should be awarded to the applicants

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal held that a claim of easement is a claim on use of land rather than possession or ownership, and that an easement on one-hand benefits and on the other burdens. The Court also held that if the land were to be registered in their names, it would amount to a total ouster of the owner of the servient land, which is against the very nature of a right to an easement.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Limitations of Actions Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case